Companies look to federal preemption to fend off California UPF lawsuit, invoking Supreme Court pesticide case
Food manufacturers are asking a California court to dismiss or narrow litigation over ultra-processed foods by arguing that federal labeling laws preempt many of the claims brought under state law. Their filings rely in part on a recent Supreme Court decision involving pesticide labeling, raising questions about how that reasoning could apply to federally regulated food products.
The case could help clarify the scope of federal preemption in food labeling disputes and influence future litigation involving state efforts to require additional warnings or disclosures.
This AgencyIQ analysis examines the companies’ legal arguments, the role of the Supreme Court’s recent decision and what the case could mean for food regulation going forward.
Fill out the form to read the full analysis.
Required *